This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/45685] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] missed conditional move opportunity in loop


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45685

Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |steven at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #24 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-13 20:45:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> I did some runtime testing on this shortly after 4.7 stage1 opened; the
> net result was actually a regression.  I didn't delve into why due to
> time constraints.
> 
> Without analysis as to why the patch regressed spec, I wouldn't be
> comfortable suggesting it for any stage.

Still looks like an interesting approach, tho'.
Do you plan to have a look at this for GCC 4.9?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]