This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/56508] [SH] Add support for rtv/n instruction


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56508

--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-10 12:08:24 UTC ---
I've only looked briefly how this could be implemented.
As far as I can see, there are two basic cases:

1) 

int test0 (int a, int b)
{
  return a;
}

currently compiles to:

        rts
        mov     r4,r0


In this case there is a reg copy of the return value to 'r0' before the return
insn.  Such patterns usually show RTL that goes something like (after prologue
and epilogue pass):

(insn 13 20 16 2 (set (reg/i:SI 0 r0)
        (reg/v:SI 4 r4 [orig:161 a ] [161])) sh_tmp.cpp:10 244 {movsi_ie}
     (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/v:SI 4 r4 [orig:161 a ] [161])
        (nil)))
(insn 16 13 25 2 (use (reg/i:SI 0 r0)) sh_tmp.cpp:10 -1
     (nil))
(note 25 16 26 2 NOTE_INSN_EPILOGUE_BEG)
(jump_insn 26 25 27 2 (return) sh_tmp.cpp:10 372 {*return_i}
     (nil)
 -> return)
(barrier 27 26 23)
(note 23 27 0 NOTE_INSN_DELETED)

This would be the easiest to convert to rtv/n.  E.g. In the split4 pass (after
register allocation, pro and epilogues, etc, but before delayed branch
scheduling), the return insn (*return_i above) could be converted into rtv/n by
walking up the insn list starting from the return insn and looking for the reg
copy insn that sets r0.  If the source of the reg copy is a GP reg, it can be
combined with the return insn as rtv/n.


2) 

int test1 (int a, int b)
{
  return a + b;
}

currently compiles to:

        mov     r4,r0
        rts
        add     r5,r0


In this case register allocation already prepares the return value in r0.  This
is a simplified case, so there can be more preceeding insns working on the
return value that is allocated to 'r0' early on.  In such cases there will not
be a reg copy to 'r0' before the return insn, so the 'combine approach' from
case 1 won't work here -- it would require additional register use analysis and
register renaming.
The obstacle for this case is that the reg copy and use insns for the return
value are generated during initial RTL expantion based on what the
TARGET_FUNCTION_VALUE hook says, but return insns are expanded after register
allocation.  Thus register allocation can't be influenced.
An option would be to return a pseudo reg in TARGET_FUNCTION_VALUE (for
outgoing == true) instead of a hard reg and adding the reg copy during return
insn expansion.  However, register allocation will then try to avoid using 'r0'
(because of allocation order).  Such cases would then result in:

int test3 (char* a)
{
  return a[0];
}

        mov.b    @r4,r1
        rts
        mov     r1,r0

or with rtv/n applied:

        mov.b   @r4,r1
        rtv/n   r1

although the better way would be to utilize the delay slot of rts:

        rts
        mov.b   @r4,r0


I guess to support this in a generic way (which could also be used by other
targets) the register for the return value should be initially left open (by
returning a pseudo in TARGET_FUNCTION_VALUE) and the register allocator should
be told a preferred register for the return value.  If the return value then
does not end up in the required register, the epilogue expansion would emit the
reg copy insn or 'rtv/n' in the SH2A.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]