This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:02:25 +0000
- Subject: [Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-55309-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309
--- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-11 15:02:25 UTC ---
If the mapping is so flexible, how can you detect mismatches? Different scale
or shadow offsets are ABI incompatible...