This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/55978] [4.8 Regression] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails
- From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:56:02 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/55978] [4.8 Regression] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-55978-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978
--- Comment #22 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-06 13:56:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> It seems to work just as well as the patch in comment #18 and is much simpler.
> Also it could catch this sort of thing in other situations as well. So I would
> say that it is preferable over the previous patches.
>
> Will test for regressions (but don't expect any).
The patch in comment 21, like the previous ones in comment 14 and 18, is free
of testsuite regressions.