This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's
- From: "kcc at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 10:30:16 +0000
- Subject: [Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-55309-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309
--- Comment #9 from Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-05 10:30:16 UTC ---
> And, for compile time, you want to be testing with --enable-checking=release
Thanks!
With --enable-checking=release gcc's compile time drops to 374 seconds.
That's much better, but still 50% slower than clang (built with asserts)