[Bug target/56211] gnulib yesno compiled incorrectly with -02 on x86_64

["pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56211

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Target|                            |x86_64-*-*
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-02-05
          Component|tree-optimization           |target
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-05 07:27:56 UTC ---
This really sounds like a bug in a mismatched function declarations and
definitions. Meaning this is not a GCC bug but rather a bug in the source you
are using.  Make sure bool is defined the same in both sides of the call.

The reason why I say this is because I just tried a simple testcase look at the
output of the code and found it does the correct thing.
Like:
_Bool g(void);

void h(void);

void f(void)
{
  if (!g())
    return h();
}
---- CUT ----
This assumes the yesno function is declared with a _Bool return type on the
calee side.
That produces:
    call    g
    testb    %al, %al

Which is not what is located in the generated assembly code that you provided:
  405402:    e8 99 7e 00 00           callq  40d2a0 <yesno>
  405407:    85 c0                    test   %eax,%eax