This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617

--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-30 16:43:03 UTC ---
Well, if somebody does the work and in a clean way that won't penalize targets
with sane linkers and object formats, I'm not objecting, I just am not going to
spend time on this.  If clang can handle ctor priorities right at least inside
of each individual CUs, perhaps those that care about targets which don't
support that in the linker can add similar support to gcc (what I've been
suggesting, if priorities aren't supported by linker, don't emit stuff right
away, but just queue it and at the end sort it and emit.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]