This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/53696] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in gimplify_decl_expr (gimplify.c:1454) with -fkeep-inline-functions on invalid use of lambda


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53696

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-07 16:27:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> If you want me to revert that patchlet of mine don't be afraid to ask, after
> all was just an ice on invalid, no big deal. Can do that immediately and then
> we have all the time to figure out something better with no fear of
> regressions, even minor.

This is also an ice-on-invalid, so trading one for another one doesn't buy us
much.  And, don't we ICE for the testcase with template anyway?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]