This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/53359] [4.8 regression] undefined reference to `__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<int>::__min'
- From: "aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 21:39:50 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/53359] [4.8 regression] undefined reference to `__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<int>::__min'
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-53359-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53359
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-06 21:39:50 UTC ---
I have a hunch that the patch for bug 53952 might fix this, if this happens to
be another case of variables that are not addressable being SRAed or otherwise
transformed in ways that makes mudflap marked as addressable and checked when
they didn't even have to be output in the first place. A preprocessed testcase
would help me test this theory more immediately with a cross compiler, rather
than a full cross toolchain.