This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug debug/55541] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] unable to see local variables due extra lexical block was generated


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55541

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW
         AssignedTo|jason at gcc dot gnu.org    |unassigned at gcc dot
                   |                            |gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-05 16:22:15 UTC ---
I'm finding the LOCATION_BLOCK code somewhat opaque, and think that I should
take care of more recent regressions before diving into it too much, so I'm
going to put this aside for now.

I don't remember the rationale for the extra block, but changing
finish_function to strip it right away causes quite a few testsuite
regressions.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]