This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/15184] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Direct access to byte inside word not working with -march=pentiumpro


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184

Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org   |

--- Comment #23 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-11 21:24:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> (In reply to comment #20)
> 
> > Please can the RMs have a new look at this.
> 
> This is tuning decision, and I see Intel folks in the CC. I see no problem
> in changing these defaults, if they are supported by some benchmark results.

The original report was probably a tuning issue, but the code from
comment #13 (which is similar to what trunk produces) looks like more
than a tuning issue to me.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]