This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug debug/54402] [4.8 Regression] var-tracking does not scale


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402

--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-29 17:24:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 28563
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28563
gcc48-pr54402-2.patch

Just for completeness, I'm attaching my earlier attempt to fix the
reflect/check compile time, but unfortunately that only gave speedup from
around 49minutes to 19minutes.  With the huge number of locs values before
gcc48-pr54402.patch
the problem was that find_base_term was extremely expensive, and not cached in
any way.  Once var-tracking finishes initialization, what is find_base_term of
some value shouldn't IMHO change.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]