This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug go/54918] libgo.so.0 is not runtime compatible between gcc-4.6.2 and gcc-4.7.x


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54918

--- Comment #2 from Cristian Gafton <gafton at gmail dot com> 2012-10-15 17:53:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> incompatible as in missing symbols or in incompatible behavior between
> different
> symbols?

I have only run across missing symbols, but it looks like none of the changes
in the libgo library have been dressed with any sort of symbol versioning, so
there could also be some incompatible behaviour changes. I have not studied the
libgo source enough to make that determination though;  the missing symbols
make it hard to test older binaries to check for behavioral changes.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]