This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/54884] [4.8 Regression] Externally used PRIVATE module procedure wrongly marked as TREE_PUBLIC()=0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54884

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-10 07:42:10 UTC ---
There is the following code in resolve.c's resolve_variable:

  if (specification_expr && sym->attr.access == ACCESS_PRIVATE
      && !sym->attr.function && !sym->attr.use_assoc
      && gfc_current_ns->proc_name && gfc_current_ns->proc_name->attr.function)
    sym->attr.public_used = 1;

I don't have a GCC 4.8 build at hand, but I think the issue is that
  sym->attr.access == ACCESS_PRIVATE
is false. I assume that sym->attr.access == ACCESS_UNKNOWN; one probably needs
to check instead:
          && (sym->ns->default_access == ACCESS_PRIVATE
              || (sym->ns->default_access == ACCESS_UNKNOWN
                  && gfc_option.flag_module_private)))

 * * *

(In reply to comment #1)
> Duplicate of pr54221 (see comment #5)?

Duplicate of PR54221: No, that's a completely separate issue.
Duplicate of PR54221 comment 5: Well, it links to the Andrew's bug-reporting
email, hence, it is a duplicate.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]