This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/54847] --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes non-functional on darwin
- From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 23:14:55 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/54847] --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes non-functional on darwin
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-54847-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #18 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-10-07 23:14:55 UTC ---
To repeat what I meant: the autoconf test is built by the C++ compiler. Given
that, writing 'timespec' or writing 'struct timespec' is exactly the same. Just
wanted to clarify why, even from a formal point of view, the patch cannot be
right, I didn't really mean to analyze in any detail the existing autoconf test
(I didn't write this specific one, IIRC). Again send patches to libstdc++,
possibly CC Jon.