This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/54394] [4.8 Regression] fatigue2 -flto run time regression


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54394

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|fatigue2 -flto run time     |[4.8 Regression] fatigue2
                   |regression                  |-flto run time regression

--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-08-29 15:46:58 UTC ---
I see something similar on x86_64-apple-darwin10, but with -fwhole-program and
not with -flto:
i.e., with -Ofast before or after r190346 the run time is ~150s and does not
change with -flto.
At r190345 and before, the run time with -fwhole-program is ~100s (and ~56s
with --param max-inline-insns-auto=98 -funroll-loops), while it is ~142s at
r190346 and after.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]