This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/54130] Recognize builtins with bool return type


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54130

--- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-01 09:49:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > I realize that several (not all) of the things discussed here assume that
> > functions returning bool and int are binary compatible, which is likely true on
> > most platforms but there might be exceptions.
> 
> It's not true on x86_64 - return values are not extended to word_mode thus
> you may have garbage in the upper parts of %eax for bool.

Ok thanks, that seems to put the nail in the coffin for these techniques. I
guess I should close this bug, and file the only part that remains (the missed
optimization at the end of Comment 8) separately.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]