This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug lto/53831] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Virtuals missing in LTO symtab
- From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 09:27:53 +0000
- Subject: [Bug lto/53831] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Virtuals missing in LTO symtab
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-53831-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |andi-gcc at firstfloor dot
| |org
--- Comment #20 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-04 09:27:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> (In reply to comment #18)
>
> > The testcase is fixed when using -fno-fat-lto-objects and gcc-ar
>
> For me x64_64-linux version works if I use gcc-ar (both with and without
> -fno-fat-lto-objects).
>
> > (which is not required, or should not be required(?) for -ffat-lto-objects?)
>
> No idea, today is the first time I hear about gcc-nm/ar. Are there any online
> docs? Are users supposed to create LTO archives with gcc-ar instead of good ol'
> ar these days?
Good question, even I am not sure. This is an area that could have
documentation. Honza, Andi, can you clarify?