This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/53681] s390 bootstrap failure since 187965
- From: "krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 07:09:04 +0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/53681] s390 bootstrap failure since 187965
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-53681-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-18 07:09:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I don't see how r187965 could cause this, but I do see the problem.
> mark_sym_for_renaming (called via the s390 va_arg_expr expander) is called
> during, well, gimplification from GENERIC. At that point SSA isn't
> initialized yet, so cfun->gimple_df is still NULL, and so SYMS_TO_RENAME
> gives a segfault.
>
> You either have to guard the call to mark_sym_for_renaming with
> gimple_in_ssa_p(), or get rid of the call alltogether. I don't see how
> new va_arg expressions would be generated during SSA optimizers, so the latter
> solution would be safe. No other backend calls mark_sym_for_renaming either,
> so just remove it.
?! You appear to have added the call to mark_sym_for_renaming with your patch.
Since it isn't mentioned in the changelog perhaps it is a leftover from
something else in your tree? So the solution is to revert that change?
svn diff -r 187964:187965 gcc/config/s390/s390.c
Index: gcc/config/s390/s390.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/s390/s390.c (revision 187964)
+++ gcc/config/s390/s390.c (revision 187965)
@@ -9044,6 +9044,7 @@
lab_false = create_artificial_label (UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
lab_over = create_artificial_label (UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
addr = create_tmp_var (ptr_type_node, "addr");
+ mark_sym_for_renaming (addr);
t = fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (reg), size_int (max_reg));
t = build2 (GT_EXPR, boolean_type_node, reg, t);