This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/53647] [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/20011229-1.c and gcc.c-torture/compile/pr25311.c
- From: "wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:09:48 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/53647] [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/20011229-1.c and gcc.c-torture/compile/pr25311.c
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-53647-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53647
--- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-12 19:09:48 UTC ---
If this is incorrect, and zero is supposed to indicate a cacheless memory (do
they exist anymore?), then I can disable the adjacent-loads hoisting
optimization for that case. Someone know the answer for this?