This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/53646] Surprising effects of cxx11 vs cxx98 ABI compatibility
- From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:12:55 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/53646] Surprising effects of cxx11 vs cxx98 ABI compatibility
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-53646-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53646
--- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-06-12 16:12:55 UTC ---
If I remember correctly, the last time I tried, default + is_constructible
worked pretty well modulo testcases sensitive to access control under sfinae.
But the latter we are going to implment anyway for 4.8, thus temporary FIXME or
something in the testcases would be fine.