This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/52008] [C++0x] ICE when adding partial specialization for variadic-templated structure


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |SUSPENDED

--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-04-20 15:40:09 UTC ---
The issue isn't whether it's a specialization or not, but whether it's
technically more specialized. I didn't personally check in detail but Jason
argued on the ISO reflector that is not ([c++std-core-21739]). And the reason
why currently other front-ends accept the code is that they pick the primary
for the instantiation. Thus this should be made more explicitly ill-formed in
the standard with a DR. Let's suspend the PR for now.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]