This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/51244] SH Target: Inefficient conditional branch


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244

--- Comment #30 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-09 10:02:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> (In reply to comment #28)
> Regtest on sh4-unknown-lunix-gnu has been done successfully.
> Oleg, your patch is pre-approved.

Thanks a lot!
Could you please attach the testsuite summary of your setup?  I'd like to
compare them to my results (in particular the libstdc++ tests).
I'm now getting similar effects as in #comment 9 again, where a bunch of
libstdc++ failures disappear and this time one new failure appears:
FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/cons/char/6.cc execution test

This is weird...


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]