This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/45472] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] [Middle-end volatile semantics] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2
- From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:45:52 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/45472] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] [Middle-end volatile semantics] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-45472-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-27 08:45:52 UTC ---
> If the C or C++ standards say that vv1 = vv2 should behave as if the copy was
> elementwise then the frontends need changing. Certainly not the gimplifier -
> that's not the kitchen-sink for things you don't want to properly describe in
> GENERIC to the middle-end ;)
Yes, I think that we wouldn't want this in Ada for example.