This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/51528] [4.6 Regression] SRA should not create BOOLEAN_TYPE replacements
- From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:40:43 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/51528] [4.6 Regression] SRA should not create BOOLEAN_TYPE replacements
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-51528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-13 20:40:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> So, I don't see what's wrong on PPC (with SRA, that is). This must be
> a target bug if at all (note I'm only inspecting dumps and did not
> reproduce the execute fail).
yes, seems to be .. the tree-ssa dump is unchanged between -O1 (OK) and -O2
(fails).
this seems to be a 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 regression [4.4. is OK] - the call to bar
() is being dropped from foo ().
will move to a different PR. Thanks for the test-case ;)