This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/50283] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test
- From: "rth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:40:22 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/50283] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-50283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283
--- Comment #16 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-10 21:40:22 UTC ---
Calls are especially problematic, yes. You've just fixed a bug
for branches; hopefully that's the last of them.
Though if it were a matter of preferences, I would expect that
choosing a non-frame-related insn for the delay slot over a
frame-related insn of otherwise equal priority would produce
less heartburn in consumers even if it's possibly to handle it
within gcc.
You absolutely correct that we ought to have a check for this.