This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/51705] Build infrastructure should not use -std=c++0x until g++ properly supports it
- From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:06:59 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/51705] Build infrastructure should not use -std=c++0x until g++ properly supports it
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-51705-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> 2011-12-29 22:06:59 UTC ---
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 09:39:12PM +0000, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
>
> --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-29 21:39:12 UTC ---
> So change component to 'bootstrap' and get a FreeBSD maintainer to
> update fixincludes and/or tell the FreeBSD libc team to test with
> esoteric third-party compilers such as the little-known GCC before
> making such changes
Thanks for the condescending email. Testing with GCC is
exactly how the problem was found. g++ is telling the
FreeBSD libc++ developers, 'Yes, I support C++11'. The
FreeBSD libc++ developers are using C++11 features, and
implementing the required C++11 library support. g++ chokes.
I personally could not care less about C++; until it
makes it much more difficult for me to work on gfortran.
(Ed, I'm sorry I asked you to submit a bug. I can
understand your reluctance.)