This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/48713] Error: invalid instruction suffix for push


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48713

Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-17 16:14:28 UTC ---
Yes, this issue happens if you are mixing 32-bit binutils and 64-bit gcc.  You
can test, if you have actually downloaded an native 64-bit Windows gcc
compiler, by specifying on command for compile only the option '-m32'.  I
assume it will be successful then.
I've tested your module compilation by i686-w64-mingw32 fortran-compiler and it
translates without flaws.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]