This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/51315] [4.6/4.7 regression] unaligned memory accesses generated with -ftree-sra
- From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:16:21 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/51315] [4.6/4.7 regression] unaligned memory accesses generated with -ftree-sra
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-51315-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51315
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-06 14:16:21 UTC ---
Note that in the end it's always us transforming
a->b.c
to (effectively)
T *tem = &a->b.c;
*tem
which expand unfortunately handles differently. So whenever we do that
we have to either avoid doing that if expand would have a different
idea about the results alignment (there is currently no way that computes
just expands idea of an expressions alignment - one piece of a good
solution would provide that, not only SRA has this "issue"), or, stick
that information somewhere (on the TREE_TYPE of the MEM_REF tree, but
then it will only be honoured if the target provides a movmisalign
optab - the other piece of a good solution would be that expand _always_
honors such alignment information and goes the same way as when expanding
component refs).