This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/27692] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27692

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-10-10 21:45:19 UTC ---
I honestly don't understand how such a warning would look like: like warning
for any snippet of code where destructors could run in an unpredictable order?
I'm adding Jason in CC in case he can imagine something in this area...
otherwise I guess I would ask you or Steve to just change those testcases to be
skipped instead of xfailed and be done with this very old PR.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]