This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/50454] Unexpected problems with -pedantic / -pedantic-errors and __int128 and unsigned __int128 specializations
- From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:56:22 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/50454] Unexpected problems with -pedantic / -pedantic-errors and __int128 and unsigned __int128 specializations
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-50454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50454
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-09-19 23:56:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 25321
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25321
patchlet
Constructively, this is something which should lead to unsigned __int128
treated exactly like plain __int128 (note: not fully tested)
On x86_64 -m32, where __int128 isn't available we reject with 'template
argument 1 is invalid', we don't reach grokdeclarator at all.