This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/50413] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect instruction is used to shift value of 128 bit xmm0 registrer


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413

--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-09-19 15:20:22 UTC ---
> On Linux/x86, I got
>
> FAIL: g++.dg/vect/slp-pr50413.cc scan-tree-dump-times slp "basic block
> vectorized using SLP" 0

I get the same failure on x86_64-apple-darwin10. Grepping for SLP returns

170: Build SLP for V.uint128.uint64_lower = 0;
170: Build SLP for V.uint128.uint64_upper = 3556786177;
170: Basic block will be vectorized using SLP
170: SLPing BB
170: ------>SLPing statement: V.uint128.uint64_lower = 0;
170: ------>vectorizing SLP node starting from: V.uint128.uint64_lower = 0;
170: vectorizing stmts using SLP.
170: basic block vectorized using SLP
/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/slp-pr50413.cc:168: note: Failed to SLP
the basic block.
/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/slp-pr50413.cc:168: note: not
vectorized: failed to find SLP opportunities in basic block.

If I omit '-fno-vect-cost-model', I get

170: Build SLP for V.uint128.uint64_lower = 0;
170: Build SLP for V.uint128.uint64_upper = 3556786177;
/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/slp-pr50413.cc:168: note: Failed to SLP
the basic block.
/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/slp-pr50413.cc:168: note: not
vectorized: failed to find SLP opportunities in basic block.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]