This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L
- From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 12:57:56 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-1773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #113 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-08-09 12:56:20 UTC ---
As you've probably seen, I've cleaned up and tested Marc's patches over
the weekend, threw some more testing (Solaris 8/9/10) in yesterday,
and posted the results to gcc-patches etc.:
[java, libjava] Allow C++ compilation with Solaris headers
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00832.html
[c++] Keep tm, div_t, ldiv_t, lconv mangling on Solaris (PR libstdc++-v3/1773)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00834.html
[fixincludes] Allow properly defining __cplusplus with Solaris headers (PR
libstdc++-v3/1773)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00833.html
[v3] Use Solaris prototypes if possible (PR libstdc++-v3/1773)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00835.html
[libcpp] Correctly define __cplusplus (PR libstdc++-v3/1773)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00837.html
Many thanks to Marc for his hard work to make this a reality. I just
think it's easier to discuss the separate issues in their own threads on
the proper mailing lists, rather than on bugzilla.
Rainer