This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libfortran/49970] "make prefix=... install" doesn't work
- From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 19:09:28 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libfortran/49970] "make prefix=... install" doesn't work
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-49970-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> 2011-08-03 19:09:22 UTC ---
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 07:01:55PM +0000, jimis at gmx dot net wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
>
> --- Comment #2 from jimis <jimis at gmx dot net> 2011-08-03 19:01:51 UTC ---
> I use it casually for packages that use autotools to configure the build, it
> always works fine. And for gcc it has worked for me plenty of times for i386
> C-frontend only builds, and till not I've only seen libgfortran failing.
>
> Why it should be supported? Especially for GCC it is very handy, I build the
> beast without configuring --prefix at all, and then install someplace. Then I
> apply some patch, hit make and only relevant files are compiled, and install
> some place elsewhere. If I had to reconfigure with a different --prefix, make
> would build many more files, and I'd have to delete various config.cache files
> because I reconfigured.
Have you actually read the instead instructions for gcc?
Have you tried the documented method [*]:
make DESTDIR=path-to-rootdir install
[*] I don't know if it works. If it fails, then you have
bug to report.