This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/49813] [C++0x] sinh vs asinh vs constexpr
- From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:56:29 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/49813] [C++0x] sinh vs asinh vs constexpr
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-49813-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
--- Comment #49 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-07-27 22:56:10 UTC ---
Thanks for your feedback Kaveh. Note, however, that, as I mentioned only today
in Comment #45, with -m32 we have problems also with the overload for double, I
have no idea how to fix it. More generally, I would be *really* curious to
understand what's so special about isinf vs isnan and the other classification
facilities, only isinf gives me troubles...