This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/49813] [C++0x] sinh vs asinh vs constexpr


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813

--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-07-22 10:52:03 UTC ---
We don't want this to depend on -std=gnu++0x vs -std=c++0x!!

The function is there, declared and callable, as removing constexpr reveals,
the behavior wrt constexpr data cannot depend on __STRICT_ANSI__.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]