[Bug target/49798] .quad instead of .long is used for address for x32

["ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49798

--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2011-07-21 16:25:49 UTC ---
Please compare optimized tree dumps from i686 (a) compilation vs x32 (b):

(a)

foo (union U u)
{
  union U v;
  _Bool D.2000;
  double D.1999;
  double D.1998;
  int D.1997;

<bb 2>:
  v = {};
  v.m = &xxxx;
  D.1998_1 = u.d;
  D.1999_2 = v.d;
  D.2000_3 = D.1998_1 == D.1999_2;
  D.1997_4 = (int) D.2000_3;
  return D.1997_4;

}

(b)

foo (union U u)
{
  double D.2709;
  _Bool D.2704;
  double D.2702;
  int D.2701;

<bb 2>:
  D.2709_8 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<double>(&xxxx);
  D.2702_1 = u.d;
  D.2704_3 = D.2702_1 == D.2709_8;
  D.2701_4 = (int) D.2704_3;
  return D.2701_4;

}

We can't directly move &xxxx (32bit value) to double (64bit value).

However, we expand to:

(insn 6 5 11 (set (reg/f:DI 66)
        (symbol_ref:DI ("xxxx") [flags 0x40]  <var_decl 0x7f71c5925140 xxxx>))
pr49798.c:12 -1
     (nil))

...

(insn 13 12 14 (set (reg:CCFPU 17 flags)
        (compare:CCFPU (reg:DF 73)
            (subreg:DF (reg/f:DI 66) 0))) pr49798.c:13 -1
     (nil))

Does this looks OK?