This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/49725] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: c34005a
- From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:59:13 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/49725] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: c34005a
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-49725-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49725
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-14 08:58:42 UTC ---
> I will have a look at it next week (if it can be reproduced on the hppa in the
> compile farm).
A cross-compiler from your favorite linux box is sufficient.
> Nevertheless, the interesting thing is that the patch only makes SRA to do
> less, never more. Does the ICE happen even if you switch SRA off completely
> with -fno-tree-sra ?
Hum, yes, you're right, the ICE comes from PRE, not SRA.