This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835

--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-14 11:27:24 UTC ---
> Why not patch the frontend to magically make System.Address a pointer type for
> the backend to deal with? That way, no functions have to be changed, and
> potential other targets with âweirdâ calling conventions immediately share in
> the benefit.

Let's be clear: changing the Ada front-end because of weird ABIs on little-used
platforms is pretty much out of question; this issue only arises on m68k AFAIK.

> As for the âcompatibility trickâ, it works the other way around, only when a
> pointer-returning function is called expecting integers. Here, we have an
> integer-returning function by mistake.

Right, that's precisely why I proposed the attribute.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]