This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libfortran/49024] REAL*16 ERFC_SCALED inaccuracy
- From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 22:08:13 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libfortran/49024] REAL*16 ERFC_SCALED inaccuracy
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-49024-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49024
Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|fxcoudert at gcc dot |unassigned at gcc dot
|gnu.org |gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-23 21:48:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> For 128 bits: do you plan to handle it in libgfortran or directly in
> libquadmath? I think one can export another function directly in libquadmath,
> which should be easier to handle - and yield faster code.
I've thought about it a bit, both are fine with me. Butâ I don't have time to
play with Mathematica right now to find the good approximations in each
possible range, so I'll unassign myself.