This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/48970] New: Inaccurate comments for processor_costs
- From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:14:00 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/48970] New: Inaccurate comments for processor_costs
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48970
Summary: Inaccurate comments for processor_costs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: hjl.tools@gmail.com
CC: ubizjak@gmail.com
Target: x86
i386.h has
struct processor_costs {
...
const int sse_load[3]; /* cost of loading SSE register
in SImode, DImode and TImode*/
const int sse_store[3]; /* cost of storing SSE register
in SImode, DImode and TImode*/
But i386.c has
if (SSE_CLASS_P (regclass))
{
int index;
switch (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode))
{
case 4:
index = 0;
break;
case 8:
index = 1;
break;
case 16:
index = 2;
break;
default:
return 100;
}
if (in == 2)
return MAX (ix86_cost->sse_load [index], ix86_cost->sse_store [index]);
return in ? ix86_cost->sse_load [index] : ix86_cost->sse_store [index];
}
SImode, DImode nor TImode aren't used to compute costs.