This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/48585] [4.7 Regression] 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build
- From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:22:46 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/48585] [4.7 Regression] 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-48585-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2011-04-15 09:22:36 UTC ---
> And indeed it does. Therefore I believe we should add it to the referenced set
> of a clone in the WPA stage...?
Yes, we spoke on this some time ago - when propagating constant into function
we should
add reference and we also should remove references when promoting indirect call
to direct
to let the target to be optimized well.
Honza