This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug lto/41159] [LTO] ICE in insert_value_copy_on_edge, at tree-outof-ssa.c:225
- From: "bpringlemeir at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:57:33 +0000
- Subject: [Bug lto/41159] [LTO] ICE in insert_value_copy_on_edge, at tree-outof-ssa.c:225
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-41159-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41159
Bill Pringlemeir <bpringlemeir at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bpringlemeir at gmail dot
| |com
--- Comment #9 from Bill Pringlemeir <bpringlemeir at gmail dot com> 2011-04-14 21:57:23 UTC ---
I believe I also have this occurring with host=x86_64-linux
target=arm-linux-gnueabi. After reading this ticket, I retried my compiles
with the same link and compile optimization level and it succeeds.
I understand that you want gcc to support different option levels for both
compile and link. However, I don't know that most people want this and I am
not use to passing the linker options; a diagnostic for ld/gold plug-in when
there is an optimization mismatch may be helpful? Is that a possibility for
4.5.x and 4.6.x releases?