This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/48478] New: Valid array-constructor syntax rejected/invalid accepted
- From: "ian_harvey at bigpond dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:51:12 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/48478] New: Valid array-constructor syntax rejected/invalid accepted
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48478
Summary: Valid array-constructor syntax rejected/invalid
accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ian_harvey@bigpond.com
Created attachment 23898
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23898
Demonstrates valid and invalid syntax
gfortran 4.7 compiled from trunk revision 171951 rejects an array constructor
with syntax:
[ derived_type_name:: ... ]
With -Wall --std=f2003 it accepts without complaint one of the form:
[ TYPE(derived_type_name):: ... ]
>From F2008 draft:
R468: array-constructor is (/ ac-spec /)
or lbracket ac-spec rbracket
R469: ac-spec is type-spec ::
or [type-spec ::] ac-value-list
R402: type-spec is intrinsic-type-spec
or derived-type-spec
R453: derived-type-spec is type-name [(type-param-spec-list)]
It looks like the compiler has confused a type-spec with a
declaration-type-spec, (which does use the TYPE keyword).