This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/48290] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c, ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1072


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290

--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2011-03-29 09:22:15 UTC ---
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290
> 
> --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-03-28 18:26:52 UTC ---
> The patch in comment #3 fixes the ICE, but the test still fails:
> 
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "OUTER LOOP VECTORIZED" 1
> 
> Compiling with -Ofast -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=2 I get
> 
> /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c:11: note: not vectorized:
> unsupported data-type
> /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c:6: note: vectorized 0 loops
> in function.

That's expected.  I suppose the testcase is no longer testing what it
was supposed to test (even before, as LIM was applying store-sinking to
the store).


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]