[Bug testsuite/48245] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr46940 c_lto_pr46940_0.o assemble on *-apple-darwin*

["ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245

--- Comment #23 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-03-28 11:11:09 UTC ---
> --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-03-24 18:46:41 UTC ---
>> AFAICT, comment #12 is OK on *-darwin9 including cross-cris-elf.
>> given that Mike has approved, 
>> if someone could chip in with a test on x86-64-darwin10, I would think you
>> could apply it.
>
> I have bootstrapped gcc on x86-64-darwin10 with the patch in comment #12 on top
> of revision 171401 without failures for the tests ran by lto.exp (full test by
> tomorrow).

Thanks.  Based on Iain's and your testing and Mike's approval, I've
applied the patch (slightly adapted to match the gcc.c form).

> Now I wonder what are the tests
>
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20100722-1_0.c
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1_0.c
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr46940_0.c
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr47188_0.c
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr43157.c
>
> supposed to test? pr46940_0.c fails because "only weak aliases are supported"
> on darwin and the other tests pass even without plugin support.

No idea.  You'll have to ask the patch authors.  This whole LTO and
lto-plugin business remains a mystery to me.

    Rainer