This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug testsuite/48245] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr46940 c_lto_pr46940_0.o assemble on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245

--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-03-23 17:10:38 UTC ---
> maybe this is getting complex enough to warrant a spec of its own? (and then we
> could avoid cloning it)

Why would you want to clone that?  LINK_PLUGIN_SPEC is defined in gcc.c
before it is used in LINK_COMMAND_SPEC, irrespective if the latter is
from gcc itself or from target headers.  Just use it as is.

The fact that Darwin uses a clone of LINK_COMMAND_SPEC instead of having
hooks in the generic one to to its stuff is a mistake, IMO.

    Rainer
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]