This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/41603] [-fwhole-file] Add diagnostic for assumed-length character function


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41603

Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-13 15:54:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Just for completeness: The wording in
>   J3/04-007 (p. 259, ll. 38-41; "12.3.2.1 Interface block")
> and in
>   J3/97-007r2 (p. 194, ll. 32-34)
> is effectively the same. Thus there does not seem to be any change in the
> normative text. Assuming that there is none, I think concluding that the note
> still holds in F2003 is likely. I think I follow this line of thought and do
> not hand in an interpretation request.
> 
> If someone does not think so, we can still do so - an IR is only little work
> for us and does also not take so much work in this case for J3/WG5.

Dear Tobias,

I think that this is a WONTFIX.  Please reopen it if you disagree.

Cheers

Paul


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]