This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/48089] [C++0x] ICE on in(?)valid in constexpr constructors
- From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:11:20 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/48089] [C++0x] ICE on in(?)valid in constexpr constructors
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-48089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48089
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.03.12 13:11:18
Version|unknown |4.6.0
Summary|ICE on in(?)valid in |[C++0x] ICE on in(?)valid
|constexpr constructors |in constexpr constructors
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-12 13:11:18 UTC ---
I guess an ICE is one way to solve the missing diagnostic for PR 18016 ;)
4.5 didn't ICE, but then constexpr was ignored so I'm not sure it counts as a
regression