This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/47679] [4.6 Regression] Strange uninitialized warning after SRA
- From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:27:14 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/47679] [4.6 Regression] Strange uninitialized warning after SRA
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-47679-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47679
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.03.03 11:26:57
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-03 11:26:57 UTC ---
> Another thing is why the MEM_REF in the diagnostic isn't printed as
> aNewItem.m_storage.dummy_ or aNewItem.m_storage.dummy_.data or
> aNewItem.m_storage.
this is because it doesn't usually match the source and in some cases
is ambiguous. It's by design.